Hermeneutics or Dogmatic Qualification? The Dispute over the Formula “I Offer You … Divinity”

Piotr Jankowski

pjankowski@buziaczek.pl
Academy of Social and Media Culture in Toruń, Poland (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3704-1677

Abstract

This article offers a polemical and systematic theological analysis of the formula “I offer You the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity” contained in the Divine Mercy Chaplet. The central problem is examined in light of the normative Christological framework established by the Council of Nicaea I, the Council of Chalcedon, and the subsequent doctrinal tradition of the Church. The study proceeds from the principle lex orandi – lex credendi, according to which the language of prayer not only expresses faith but also remains subject to doctrinal evaluation. The article argues that the disputed formula cannot be resolved solely by devotional, affective, or mystical hermeneutics if its literal structure introduces “Divinity” into the semantic scope of sacrificial offering. The first part reconstructs the classical theology of Christ’s sacrifice as accomplished according to His humanity, while its salvific efficacy derives from His divinity. The second part analyzes the linguistic and dogmatic structure of the formula itself and argues that it entails a categorical confusion between what may be sacrificially offered and what, by reason of divine immutability and consubstantiality, cannot become the object of oblation. The third part addresses the distinction between hermeneutical mitigation and dogmatic qualification, asking whether the formula should be treated merely as an imprecise devotional expression or as an objectively erroneous theological proposition in the material sense. The article concludes that doctrinal coherence requires more than pious intention and that the Church’s prayer must remain accountable to the ontological and Christological precision of Catholic dogma.

Keywords:

Divine Mercy Chaplet, sacrifice of Christ, lex orandi – lex credenda, material heresy, Christology, dogmatic theology, Divine Mercy, Nicene-Chalcedonian doctrine

Augustinus, A. (1845–1864). De Trinitate. W: J.-P. Migne (red.), Patrologia Latina (t. 42). Paris: Garnier / J.-P. Migne.
  Google Scholar

Baron, A. i Pietras, H. SJ (red.). (2005). Dokumenty Soborów Powszechnych (t. I: 325–787). Kraków: WAM.
  Google Scholar

Bartnik, C. S. (2008). O tekście Koronki do Miłosierdzia Bożego. Teologia w Polsce, 2(2), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2008.2.2.06
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2008.2.2.06   Google Scholar

Beinert, W. (Hg.). (1991). Glaube als Zustimmung: zur Interpretation kirchlicher Rezeptionsvorgänge. Freiburg i. Br.: Herder.
  Google Scholar

Balthasar, H. U. von. (1994). Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory. Vol. IV: The Action (G. Harrison, tłum.). San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
  Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (2012). Norms regarding the manner of proceeding in the discernment of presumed apparitions or revelations (Normae de modo procedendi in diudicandis praesumptis apparitionibus ac revelationibus). Watykan. (Dokument z 1978, publ. oficjalna 2012).
  Google Scholar

Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum. (2002). Directorium de pietate populari et liturgia. Principia et orientationes. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
  Google Scholar

Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei. (1978). Notificatio de cultu Divinae Misericordiae. Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 70, 350.
  Google Scholar

Denzinger, H. i Hünermann, P. (red.). (2010). Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum (43. wyd.). Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
  Google Scholar

Dudek, A. (2010). Relacyjny charakter Miłosierdzia. W: K. Góźdź i K. Guzowski (red.), Dogmatyka w perspektywie Bożego Miłosierdzia (s. 417–431). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
  Google Scholar

Granat, W. (1970). Miłosierdzie jako przymiot Boga. W: W. Granat (red.), Ewangelia miłosierdzia (s. 8–47). Poznań: Pallottinum.
  Google Scholar

Ioannes Damascenus. (1864). De fide orthodoxa. W: J.-P. Migne (red.), Patrologia Graeca (t. 94). Paris.
  Google Scholar

Ioannes Damascenus. (1969). Wykład wiary prawdziwej (De fide orthodoxa). Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
  Google Scholar

Ioannes Paulus II. (1980). Dives in misericordia.
  Google Scholar

Kasper, W. (1982). Der Gott Jesu Christi: Das Glaubensbekenntnis der Kirche. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.
  Google Scholar

Katechizm Kościoła Katolickiego. (1994). Poznań: Pallottinum.
  Google Scholar

Kongregacja Nauki Wiary [Sacra Congregatio Sancti Officii]. (1959). Notificatio de scriptis Sororis Faustinae Kowalska. Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 51, 271.
  Google Scholar

Kowalska, F. (2005). Dzienniczek. Miłosierdzie Boże w duszy mojej. Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Rahner, K. (1967). Der dreifaltige Gott als transzendenter Urgrund der Heilsgeschichte. W: J. Feiner i M. Löhrer (red.), Mysterium Salutis (t. II). Einsiedeln: Benziger.
  Google Scholar

Rahner, K. (1997). The Trinity (J. Donceel, tłum.). New York: Crossroad.
  Google Scholar

Ratzinger, J. (1994). Wprowadzenie w chrześcijaństwo. Kraków: Znak.
  Google Scholar

Ratzinger, J. (2002). Duch liturgii. Poznań: Christianitas.
  Google Scholar

Różycki, I. (2008). Nabożeństwo do Miłosierdzia Bożego: studium teologiczne Dzienniczka świętej Siostry Faustyny Kowalskiej na temat Nabożeństwa (wyd. 2). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Misericordia Zgromadzenia Sióstr Matki Bożej Miłosierdzia.
  Google Scholar

Słomski, W. (2025). Teologiczna analiza formuły „ofiaruję Ci… Bóstwo” w Koronce do Miłosierdzia Bożego w świetle chrystologii nicejsko-chalcedońskiej. Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne, 38(2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2025.2.5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2025.2.5   Google Scholar

Sobór Chalcedoński. (2010). Definitio fidei. W: H. Denzinger i P. Hünermann (red.), Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum (nr 301–302). Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
  Google Scholar

Sobór Konstantynopolitański II. (2010). W: H. Denzinger i P. Hünermann (red.), Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum (nr 421–438). Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
  Google Scholar

Sobór Nicejski I. (2010). Symbolum Nicaenum. W: H. Denzinger i P. Hünermann (red.), Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum (nr 125–126). Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.
  Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas. (1888–1894). Summa theologiae. W: Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Romae: Commissio Leonina.
  Google Scholar

Urbański, S. (2016). Wszystko mi mówi o Jego Miłosierdziu. Świętość Miłosierdzia objawiona Faustynie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo ADAM.
  Google Scholar

Warchoł, P. (2016). Trynitarny wymiar miłosierdzia w sakramencie pokuty i pojednania. Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne, 29(1), 33–45.
  Google Scholar


Published
2026-06-30

Cited by

Jankowski, P. (2026). Hermeneutics or Dogmatic Qualification? The Dispute over the Formula “I Offer You … Divinity”. Warsaw Theological Studies, 39(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2026.1.5

Authors

Piotr Jankowski 
pjankowski@buziaczek.pl
Academy of Social and Media Culture in Toruń, Poland Poland
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3704-1677

Piotr Jankowski, PhD is a dogmatic theologian and currently a professor emeritus. He was previously affiliated with theological institutions in the United States. In Poland, he was formerly associated with the Academy of Social and Media Culture in Toruń. His academic specialization was dogmatic theology.



Statistics

Abstract views: 0
PDF downloads: 1


License

Copyright (c) 2026 Piotr Jankowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The journal is available free-of-charge and according to the Open Access regulations (as a PDF file on the website). The authors do not incur any costs related to publication. The journal is published in accordance with the Creative Commons license standard:  CC BY-ND 4.0 (Attribution – NoDerivatives 4.0 International)  and does not follow a concrete policy of conducting research. By submitting the article, the author gives the consent to such a form of sharing the text. The authors of the published articles retain their copyrights.